Case 6015490/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Danielle Parker v Adferiad/Diverse Cmyru — 2026
- Case reference
- 6015490/2025
- Decision date
- 30 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Danielle Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Danielle Parker's claim against Adferiad/Diverse Cmyru under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it appeared not to have been actively pursued. The tribunal had written on 17 November 2025 warning that strike out was being considered and giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The claimant did not reply. The Employment Judge was satisfied that the grounds for strike out applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment therefore disposes of the case without determining any substantive tribunal claims or awarding any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the tribunal's 17 November 2025 warning letter or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.