Mr N Rehman v Roche Products Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 6015633/2024
Decision date: 31 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr N Rehman

Respondent

Roche Products Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr N Rehman brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Roche Products Ltd. The case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 27 and 28 March 2025 before Employment Judge Taft.

The written judgment records a single outcome: the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. No separate findings, remedy calculation, or compensation award are set out in the written record.

The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The public written record therefore contains only the dismissal outcome and no further factual or legal explanation.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The written record states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the record.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.