Case 6015665/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Z Ameen v Midlands Protection Services (MPS) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015665/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Z Ameen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave Mr Z Ameen an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The reason identified was that he appeared to be a self-employed contractor and therefore was not an employee or worker within the meaning of section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996, so he had no standing to bring the claim.
Mr Ameen confirmed that he was engaged on a self-employed basis. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the claim had no prospect of success and ordered that it be struck out. The hearing listed for 14 February 2025 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim after the Claimant confirmed that he was engaged on a self-employed basis and therefore had no standing as an employee or worker within section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- no prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.