Case 6015693/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms O Osinubi v Mr David Rose, trading as Rose Financial Planning — 2026
- Case reference
- 6015693/2025
- Decision date
- 15 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms O Osinubi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 11 November 2024 to 2 January 2025 and was summarily dismissed on 2 January 2025. The tribunal found her claim for wrongful dismissal/breach of contract well-founded and awarded one week's notice pay of £769.23.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of particulars of employment as required under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act, and awarded 2 weeks' pay (£1,538.46) under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The claimant's further claim for breach of contract/unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 3 January 2025 to 14 January 2025 was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total sum of £2,307.69 within 14 days of receipt of the judgment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Summary dismissal on 2 January 2025; claimant awarded one week's notice pay of £769.23. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Breach of contract | Pleaded together with wrongful dismissal; tribunal found the claim for one week's notice well-founded (£769.23). Listed as a single award alongside wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996; award of 2 weeks' pay (£1,538.46) under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for breach of contract/unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 3 January 2025 to 14 January 2025 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,307
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 1
- Employment Act 2002 section 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.