Case 6015733/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Chauhan v Rehoboth24 Healthcare Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015733/2025
- Decision date
- 7 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Chauhan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure to determine the claim. The judgment records that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and awards £4,224.43 gross on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,649.70. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £562.12. The judgment states a total award of £6,430.25 and cancels the hearing listed on 1 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,224 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records damages for notice of £1,649.70. Paragraph 5 states a total of £6,430.25, which does not match the sum of the individual amounts stated in paragraphs 2-4. | Upheld | — | £1,650 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £562 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,430
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.