Case 6015735/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S F Tam v Stretched And Fired Operations Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015735/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S F Tam
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Tynan decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant GBP 1730.00 in total. The judgment does not provide a breakdown of that award between the listed claim categories.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; the judgment does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; the judgment does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Default judgment under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; the judgment does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,730
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.