Case 6015837/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Larkins v CS Home Heat Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015837/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Larkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Larkins, worked for CS Home Heat Ltd from 6 February 2023 to 30 July 2024. The respondent did not attend or respond. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deduction of wages and accrued holiday pay succeeded.
The tribunal awarded £2,227.50 for unpaid accrued holiday pay, calculated as 16.5 days at £135.00 per day. It also awarded £2,600.00 for unpaid wages for June 2024 and £300.00 for unpaid overtime in June 2024. The judgment noted that damages are normally calculated on a net basis, but used gross figures for the pay elements because the claimant would be liable for tax on them.
The total sum ordered was £5,127.50. The judgment did not record any further issues, legal tests, or separate award components beyond the three sums making up the total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £2,600 for unpaid wages for June 2024 and £300 for unpaid overtime in June 2024. The judgment did not split the June wages and overtime into separate claim heads, but treated them together under the unlawful deduction of wages claim. | Upheld | — | £2,900 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as unpaid accrued holiday pay for 16.5 days at £135.00 per day. | Upheld | — | £2,228 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,128
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.