Case 6015898/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs L Leach v RPS Lincolnshire Limited RECONSIDERATION — 2025

Case reference: 6015898/2024
Decision date: 12 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Adkinson. This

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs L Leach

Respondent

RPS Lincolnshire Limited RECONSIDERATION

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a reconsideration judgment in case 6015898/2024. The tribunal corrected the judgment sent to the parties on 12 March 2025, which had referred to a redundancy payment claim, and varied it so that it referred instead to a claim for a protective award.

The only substantive claim dealt with in the reconsideration judgment was the protective award claim. The tribunal recorded that the claimant consented to the claim being struck out because the number of employees at the establishment where she worked meant there could not have been a breach of the duty to consult.

The result was that the protective award claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any monetary award or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The reconsideration judgment varied the earlier judgment to refer to a claim for a protective award rather than redundancy payment. The claimant consented to strike out the claim on the basis that the number of employees at the establishment meant there could not have been a breach of the duty to consult.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.