Case 6016039/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Soliman v Pertemps On The Papers — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016039/2025
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Soliman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr D Soliman’s unfair dismissal complaint. Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer recorded that the claimant had been employed by Pertemps from 5 March 2025 to 4 April 2025, which was less than two years’ continuous service, so he could not bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal had written to the claimant on 16 May 2025 proposing strike out on the basis of lack of service and inviting submissions. The claimant did not provide reasons establishing jurisdiction, and the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment stated that the claimant’s claim in respect of arrears of pay and other payments was not affected by the decision. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' continuous service at the time of dismissal and therefore had no standing to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.