Case 6016057/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. S. Choudhry v Waythrough — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016057/2025
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. S. Choudhry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mrs S. Choudhry's complaints of automatic constructive unfair dismissal (whistleblowing), whistleblowing detriments, and discrimination arising from disability were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment also recorded that the remaining complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, direct discrimination on grounds of race, sex, disability, and religion or belief, and victimisation will proceed to a final hearing. No remedy, factual findings, or legal tests were set out in this short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of automatic constructive unfair dismissal (whistleblowing) was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that whistleblowing detriments were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that discrimination arising from disability was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the other complaint of constructive unfair dismissal will proceed to a final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that direct discrimination on grounds of race will proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that direct discrimination on grounds of sex will proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.