Case 6016090/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z A Baqi v Incuto Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016090/2024
- Decision date
- 12 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z A Baqi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 12 June 2025, Employment Judge Shulman approved a consent judgment in Mr Z A Baqi's claim against Incuto Ltd. The respondent was ordered to pay £7,750 forthwith.
The sum was broken down as £5,000 described as unfair dismissal compensation, £1,400 for notice pay, £1,100 for holiday pay, and £250 for payroll deduction. The judgment records the agreed payment only and does not set out separate liability findings or substantive reasons.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded as 'unfair dismissal compensation'. | Settled | — | £5,000 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded as 'notice pay'. | Settled | — | £1,400 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded as 'holiday pay'. | Settled | — | £1,100 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded as 'payroll deduction'. | Settled | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,750
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.