IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 6016099/2024
Decision date: 11 February 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

IN PERSON FOR THE

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that Thomas Blakey brought complaints against Wayfairer Travel Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Ludlow, counsel.

The judgment states that the complaints of automatic unfair dismissal, ordinary unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and breach of contract were made out and succeeded. The short judgment does not include reasons, legal tests, or any remedy figures.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal is made out and succeeds, but gives no further reasons or remedy figure.	Upheld	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal is made out and succeeds, but gives no further reasons or remedy figure.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is made out and succeeds, but gives no remedy figure.	Upheld	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract is made out and succeeds, but gives no remedy figure.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.