Case 6016192/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Belhadj v Victoria Homecare Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016192/2024
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Belhadj
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Belhadj presented her claim in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 24 October 2024. Victoria Homecare Limited, in creditors voluntary liquidation, failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore said a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £386.53 gross. The listed hearing on 17 April 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £386.53 gross. | Upheld | — | £387 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £387
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £387
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.