Case 6016215/2024 · Employment Tribunal
OLIVER LEMSTRA v Eurasia Carbon Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016215/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dowling Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
OLIVER LEMSTRA
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the respondent had not submitted a response to the claim by the time specified in rule 17(1). The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded.
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in June 2024. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant GBP 6,250 as the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance, and also ordered the respondent to pay GBP 6,300 as a proportion of the claimant's costs due to its unreasonable conduct of proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and awards the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £6,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.