Case 6016224/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Bukhosi Nkomo v Thorough Care Corporation Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016224/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Bukhosi Nkomo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London East hearing on 10 September 2025, held by video before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, the claimant, Bukhosi Nkomo, appeared in person and the respondent, Thorough Care Corporation Ltd, was represented by Ms C Lauret. The written record identifies three claims: notice pay, unauthorised deduction from wages, and holiday pay.
The tribunal recorded that the notice pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, and that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The holiday pay claim was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the notes state that oral reasons were given at the hearing while written reasons would only be provided if requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.