Case 6016315/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N King v Citrus Facilities Management — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016315/2024
- Decision date
- 5 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss N King and the respondent, Citrus Facilities Management, did not attend the public CVP hearing at East London Hearing Centre. Employment Judge Gordon Walker sat alone, made enquiries about the reason for the claimant’s absence, and considered the information available to the tribunal before giving judgment.
The tribunal dismissed all of the pleaded claims pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The written decision records dismissals of unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, and other payments described as national insurance contributions. No substantive liability findings were made on the merits of those claims.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded, and the decision contains no compensatory or other monetary assessment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 after the claimant did not attend and the tribunal made enquiries about the reason for her absence; no merits finding was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 after non-attendance; the written record contains no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 after the claimant did not attend; no substantive findings on entitlement were made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for arrears of pay was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 after non-attendance; the tribunal did not determine the underlying merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for other payments described as national insurance contributions was dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024; the decision record contains no further substantive findings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.