Case 6016317/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. RAZWAN v Hallo Healthcare Group (aurelius) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6016317/2024
- Decision date
- 27 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M. RAZWAN
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M. Razwan did not attend the hearing on 26 March 2026. He informed the Tribunal clerk that he did not plan to attend because he intended to challenge the most recent refusal of his application for a privacy order in the Employment Appeal Tribunal, and he requested that the hearing be postponed. The Tribunal dismissed the postponement application and proceeded in his absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.
The Tribunal struck out the claimant's breach of contract and race discrimination claims under rule 38(1)(a) and/or (b). It found that the claims had no reasonable prospects of success and that the manner in which the claimant had conducted the proceedings had been scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious.
The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £18,750 under rule 74(2)(a) and (b). This was a costs order payable by the claimant, not compensation awarded on either claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out under rule 38(1)(a) and/or (b) because the claims had no reasonable prospects of success and because of the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out under rule 38(1)(a) and/or (b) because the claims had no reasonable prospects of success and because of the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- rule 38(1)(a) and/or (b) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- rule 74(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.