Case 6016402/2024 · Employment Tribunal
George Cherry v Alta Flora Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016402/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
George Cherry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South hearing on 29 April 2025, before Employment Judge O’Neill, the claimant, George Cherry, appeared in person and brought a claim against Alta Flora Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid wages succeeded and awarded £60,860.36 gross.
The tribunal also made an award of £2,876.00 gross in respect of the respondent’s failure to provide written particulars. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the extracted text contains no further explanation of the tribunal’s reasoning beyond the awards themselves.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages succeeded and awarded £60,860.36 gross. | Upheld | — | £60,860 |
| Other | The tribunal also awarded £2,876.00 gross in respect of the respondent's failure to provide written particulars. | Upheld | — | £2,876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £63,736
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.