Mr T Doostdar v LTE Group — 2025

Case reference: 6016404/2024
Decision date: 25 February 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Barker Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr T Doostdar

Respondent

LTE Group

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal considered the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint only. By a letter dated 7 November 2024, it gave Mr T Doostdar an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not been employed for two years or more.

Mr Doostdar did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint on the basis that it had no jurisdiction to consider it. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 2 June 2025.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out after the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 7 November 2024 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the complaint should be struck out because he had not been employed for two years or more. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, and the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.