Case 6016460/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D v L de Souza Scion Interiors Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6016460/2024
- Decision date
- 4 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- On the papers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D L de Souza said that Scion Interiors Ltd employed him as a carpenter and furniture assembler from 5 July 2023 to 17 July 2024 at £13.50 per hour. He said payments were irregular and that the accumulating unpaid amount caused him to stop working. The respondent's response stated that payment had been prepared but contact with the claimant could not be made. The Tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and awarded £1,241.50.
For holiday pay, the Tribunal found no evidence of an agreement permitting untaken leave to be carried forward from the leave year ending 4 July 2024, or that statutory or sick leave explained why annual leave had not been taken. Applying the Working Time Regulations to the 13 days worked in the leave year beginning 5 July 2024, it found that the claimant had accrued approximately one day's paid leave and awarded £121.50.
The Tribunal found that the claimant resigned in response to the respondent's fundamental breach of contract through non-payment of wages and was therefore dismissed. It awarded one week's notice pay of £607.50 pursuant to s.86(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996. The redundancy payment claim was dismissed because the claimant's employment had lasted less than two years, so he had no right to a redundancy payment under s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996. The total award was £1,970.50.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £122 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awarded one week's notice pay after finding that the claimant resigned in response to the respondent's fundamental breach of contract through non-payment of wages and was therefore dismissed. | Upheld | — | £608 |
| Redundancy | The claim was dismissed because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and therefore had no right to a redundancy payment under s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,971
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Working Time Regulations
- s.86(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.