Case 6016566/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v By Millimetres Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016566/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at London Central by video on 12 March 2025 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded. It found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant his final salary and holiday pay as recorded in the payslip dated 30 September 2024, and ordered the respondent to pay a net sum of £1,901.91.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages by failure to pay final salary and holiday pay. The award was stated as one net sum and was not split between salary and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,902 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was expressly included in the unauthorised deductions finding, but the judgment did not state a separate holiday pay figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,902
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.