Case 6016584/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Belcescu v Ryan Collins,Premier Marine East Anglia Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016584/2025
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Belcescu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 7 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,020.40 gross. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Young on 25 February 2026 and sent to the parties on 2 March 2026.
The judgment does not address any separate breach of contract claim or break the award down into further components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,020 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,020
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.