Case 6016597/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Khan v On The Square Hertford Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016597/2025
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 7 May 2025. The Respondent (in creditors voluntary liquidation) failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Palmer determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £1,730.76; that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,150.00; and that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement of £2,076.96.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £6,957.72 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £1,730.76. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £3,150.00. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement of £2,076.96. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,958
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.