Case 6016613/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D James v The Banyan Wellness Center Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016613/2025
- Decision date
- 11 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £442.62 for breach of contract, arising from an underpayment of wages payable. This figure comprised £414 in respect of the period 17 to 19 October 2024 and a further £28.62 which the respondent conceded was owed.
A further claim for underpayment of wages, covering the period from 14 November 2025 to the end of the claimant's employment on 17 March 2025, was dismissed. The judgment was given orally at a CVP hearing before Employment Judge M Butler, and written reasons were not provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award of £442.62 gross for breach of contract, comprising £414 for the period 17-19 October 2024 and £28.62 conceded by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £443 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for underpayment of wages between 14 November 2025 and the end of the claimant's employment on 17 March 2025 did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £443
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.