Case 6016708/2025 · Employment Tribunal
C Hall v Ronnan Corporation (Eco) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016708/2025
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 7 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The respondent's name was amended to Ronnan Corporation (Eco) Ltd to reflect its correct title.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,300 gross. The complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded, with the respondent having failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; a further £450 gross was ordered as an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,750 gross in total, with the claimant responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the gross award. A notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, identifying the relevant decision day as 6 November 2025 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,300 for unauthorised deductions from wages. Rule 22 determination after respondent failed to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay well-founded; respondent failed to pay in accordance with regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Ordered to pay £450 gross as a further unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,750
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.