Case 6016711/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Michaela Vickers v Teckwood Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6016711/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Michaela Vickers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Michaela Vickers was told on 4 March 2025 that her employment was ending immediately because of alleged redundancy. The tribunal found that the termination occurred towards the end of, but during, her additional maternity leave. It concluded that the dismissal was automatically unfair under section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulation 20 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999.
Teckwood Ltd filed no ET3, did not attend the hearing and had taken no part in the proceedings. Having established that the respondent had been properly served, Employment Judge R S Drake entered judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 following examination of the claimant's evidence. The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract claim based on dismissal without notice.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,384.61 and a compensatory award of £19,886.72, comprising £500 for loss of statutory rights and £19,386.72 for loss from the effective date of termination, subject to a statutory maximum of 12 months. It awarded £1,118.46 net of tax for three weeks' statutory minimum notice, producing a grand total of £22,389.77.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as automatic unfair dismissal by way of dismissal during maternity leave. | Upheld | — | £21,271 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal without notice, calculated net of tax. | Upheld | — | £1,118 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,390
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,385
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £19,887
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 20 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.