Case 6016827/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Susanna Saiu v Cannabotech UK Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016827/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Balroop Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Susanna Saiu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Balroop heard the case at East London Hearing Centre (via CVP) on 20 March 2025. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent, Cannabotech UK Ltd (In Liquidation), did not attend. The tribunal adjudicated three complaints brought by the claimant against her former employer.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded, holding that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions for July, August and up to 17 September 2024. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded, the respondent having failed to pay for 11 holiday days accrued but not taken at the end of employment. The notice pay complaint was likewise well-founded, the respondent not having given the contractually required one month's notice.
By way of remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £8,888.70 in respect of the wages deduction, £1,833.37 in respect of holiday pay and £3,333.33 in respect of notice pay, with a total sum of £13,833.40. Each sum was expressed as gross, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for July, August and up to 17 September 2024. Gross sum £8,888.70 (rounded). | Upheld | — | £8,889 |
| Holiday pay | 11 holiday days accrued but not taken at termination. Gross sum £1,833.37 (rounded). | Upheld | — | £1,833 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim: respondent did not give the claimant one month's contractual notice. Gross sum £3,333.33 (rounded). | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,833
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.