Case 6016924/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J English v Hertford House Hotel — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016924/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J English
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant filed the ET1 on 31 October 2024 and sought to complain of age discrimination. A private preliminary hearing was listed for 24 October 2025, and the claimant had been directed to provide additional information concerning the claim.
Neither party attended the hearing by 2:15pm, and neither party had complied with directions to complete case management agendas. The tribunal had no information explaining the parties' non-attendance after a check of the Tribunal inbox.
The tribunal dismissed the proceedings in full under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, considering that dismissal furthered the overriding objective by avoiding further wasted time and costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant sought to complain of age discrimination and that the proceedings were dismissed in full under Rule 47 due to non-attendance. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- Rule 3 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.