Case 6016979/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lea Beattie v Umbrella-Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6016979/2024
- Decision date
- 16 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elizabeth Gibson
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lea Beattie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Lea Beattie brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Umbrella-Company Limited. The case was heard by CVP on 27 June 2025 before Employment Judge Elizabeth Gibson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Chuks Ushieagu, a litigation consultant for Peninsula.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the complaint as one of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found it not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.