Case 6017008/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sarah Bennell v Vedratek Ltd HELD AT: Liverpool (by video over CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017008/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sarah Bennell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment did not determine the underlying employment claims. It was a procedural decision on the respondent Vedratek Ltd's application for an extension of time to submit its ET3.
Employment Judge Greer, sitting at Liverpool by CVP on 18 June 2025, granted the respondent's application for an extension of time. The tribunal accepted the ET3 dated 10 January 2025 as having been submitted within the period of extended time.
As a result, Vedratek Ltd was permitted to take part in the proceedings. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment determined only the respondent's application for an extension of time to submit its ET3. It granted the application, accepted the ET3 dated 10 January 2025 as within the extended time, and permitted the respondent to take part in the proceedings. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.