Case 6017093/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Tague v Clever HR Ltd (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017093/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Tague
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms N Tague, presented her claim on 1 November 2024 against Clever HR Ltd (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation). The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The tribunal then entered judgment on the admitted or undefended parts of the claim.
On the monetary claims, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,638 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £819.00. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, for which £94.50 was ordered. The total payable was £2,551.50.
The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and that the claimant had been employed for less than two years. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not give an acceptable reason. That complaint was therefore struck out rather than determined on its merits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,638 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,638 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £819.00 damages. | Upheld | — | £819 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £94.50. | Upheld | — | £95 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,552
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.