Case 6017245/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Raza v Procands Property Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017245/2024
- Decision date
- 3 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Raza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Raza brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Procands Property Services Limited. The tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP on 3 April 2025 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall, found the complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period August 2024 in respect of work done in July 2024.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,103.96, described as the gross sum deducted. It also ordered a further £3,250 to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deduction. No other claim types or remedies were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period August 2024 in respect of work done in July 2024. It ordered payment of the gross sum deducted of £1,103.96 and a further £3,250 to compensate for financial loss attributable to the deduction. | Upheld | — | £4,354 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,354
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.