Case 6017377/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robert Moore v Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017377/2025
- Decision date
- 25 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gould Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robert Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by Cloud Video Platform at Newcastle on 25 November 2025 before Employment Judge Gould. The claimant appeared in person; the Respondent Secretary of State did not attend.
The Tribunal declared that the Secretary of State had failed to make a payment to the claimant under his application under section 182 and Part XII of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that the Secretary of State ought to make a payment in the following amounts: £718.18 for arrears of pay (net of tax and National Insurance), £960 gross holiday pay for 6.86 days of accrued annual leave untaken at termination of employment at the statutory maximum entitlement of £700 per week, and £700 gross statutory notice pay for one week of pay at the same statutory maximum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Reference under section 188(3) ERA 1996 against the Secretary of State as statutory guarantor for failure to make a payment under section 182 / Part XII ERA 1996 from the National Insurance Fund. Tribunal declared the Secretary of State ought to pay £718.18 net arrears of pay, £960 gross holiday pay (6.86 days at the £700/week statutory cap) and £700 gross statutory notice pay — totalling £2,378.18. | Upheld | — | £2,378 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,378
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,378
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 182 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 188(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 188(3)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 188(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Part XII Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.