Case 6017383/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Tabetha Moss v Lunar Health Clubs Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6017383/2024
- Decision date
- 9 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tabetha Moss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued by Employment Judge Gordon Walker after the respondent, Lunar Health Clubs Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), failed to present a response to the claim. The tribunal was satisfied that the claim form had been sent to the respondent in accordance with rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, and that the information in the claimant's claim form was sufficient to determine the claims under rule 22.
The tribunal found that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay gross sums within 14 days comprising £2,333.33 for work done but not paid in July 2024, £116.67 for work done but not paid in August 2024, and £190 for a lay off payment that had been agreed but not paid in August 2024.
The tribunal additionally ordered the respondent to pay £933.39 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay. No reasons beyond the operative findings are recorded in the Rule 22 judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Comprises £2333.33 (July 2024 unpaid wages), £116.67 (August 2024 unpaid wages) and £190 (agreed lay off payment not paid in August 2024). Tribunal found the claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Holiday pay | £933.39 awarded for accrued but untaken holiday pay. The Rule 22 judgment does not expressly separate this as a Working Time Regulations claim, but ordered payment alongside the unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,573
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13
- rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.