Case 6017399/2025 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017399/2025
- Decision date
- 5 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant claimed payment for overtime worked above his contractual hours. The respondent accepted that additional hours had been worked, but denied that the contract gave a right to paid overtime or pay above the monthly salary.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established a contractual entitlement to overtime pay, including through any amendment to the written contract. It also found that the additional hours were not shown to be a breach of contract, and in the alternative that any breach had been waived by continuing to work.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not established losses flowing from any breach of contract and dismissed the claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was treated as a possible unauthorised deduction from wages claim for unpaid overtime and was dismissed. The supplied PDF text was truncated, but the judgment outcome is visible. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was treated as a possible breach of contract claim for unpaid overtime and was dismissed. The supplied PDF text was truncated, but the judgment outcome is visible. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.