Case 6017617/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J Phillipson v Eclipse Europe (Logistics) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017617/2025
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Phillipson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 13 May 2025. The judgment records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Eclipse Europe (Logistics) Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay J Phillipson £2,060.82 gross. The judgment also states that the claimant will be responsible for any tax liabilities arising out of the gross award if tax is not deducted at source.
The written record sent to the parties on 13 October 2025 includes the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest is payable on tribunal awards unless the sum is paid in full within 14 days, with the relevant decision day recorded as 13 October 2025 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum. The judgment itself does not quantify any separate interest sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,060.82 gross. The respondent had not presented a valid response on time, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 22. | Upheld | — | £2,061 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,061
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.