Case 6017667/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Katema Kabeko Kabwaya v Morris Facility Group UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017667/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge White REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Katema Kabeko Kabwaya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Katema Kabeko Kabwaya brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Morris Facility Group UK Ltd. The respondent did not appear at the hearing before Employment Judge White in Leeds on 1 August 2025.
The tribunal found that the complaint was well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 29 April 2024 to 12 July 2024.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,052.48, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted. The claimant was recorded as being responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 29 April 2024 to 12 July 2024. The award was the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,052 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,052
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.