Case 6017690/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Maxwell v ISW Assessments Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017690/2024
- Decision date
- 19 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Maxwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dealt only with the complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
The claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out for lack of jurisdiction, but the tribunal found that he had not given an acceptable reason. The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out. The judgment stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected and would proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant had less than two years' service. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected and would proceed to hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.