Case 6017715/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Hull v New Minds New Choices Ltd t/a Naked Ground Health Club DATED: 6 October 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017715/2025
- Decision date
- 6 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Hull
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that a strike out warning had been given to the claimant on 23 September 2025 and that no response had been received from the claimant.
The claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal Order, and under Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment did not address remedies.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The one-page judgment strikes out the claim after a Rule 38 warning and no response. The PDF text does not set out particulars of this claim type; it is taken from the case context listing category. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The one-page judgment strikes out the claim after a Rule 38 warning and no response. The PDF text does not set out particulars of this claim type; it is taken from the case context listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The one-page judgment strikes out the claim after a Rule 38 warning and no response. The PDF text does not set out particulars of this claim type; it is taken from the case context listing category. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The one-page judgment strikes out the claim after a Rule 38 warning and no response. The PDF text does not set out particulars of this claim type; it is taken from the case context listing category. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The one-page judgment strikes out the claim after a Rule 38 warning and no response. The PDF text does not set out particulars of this claim type; it is taken from the case context listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.