Case 6017746/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Dyer v AGI Global Logistics Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017746/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Dyer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R S Drake, sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 3 and 4 July 2025, heard the Claimant's claims of constructive unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages against AGI Global Logistics Ltd and AGI Global Logistics (LON) Ltd. The Claimant, an executive director and 20% minority shareholder in R2, alleged that the Respondents had without his knowledge or consent paid him via dividends accounted for through a Director's Loan Account and reduced his salary from £100,000 to £9,050 per annum, thereby breaching the implied term of trust and confidence.
Applying Western Excavating (ECC) v Sharp, Malik v BCCI, Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust and Buckland v Bournemouth University, the tribunal found that R2 had not unilaterally reduced the Claimant's pay and that his co-operation and consent to the remuneration arrangements had been forthcoming throughout. The tribunal found that the Claimant must have known about the DLA, that the totality of the circumstances showed support rather than repudiation, and that the principal reason for his resignation was that he had another job to go to (at Gravitas Worldwide Ltd) rather than any conduct of R2. The alleged breach was therefore not fundamental and not the cause of resignation.
The breach of contract and unlawful deduction from pay claims also failed: the tribunal accepted R2's reliance on clause 8.2 of the DSA permitting withholding of outstanding debts at termination, and found that advance dividends paid for April to July 2024 amounted to overpayments recoverable under that clause. All three claims were dismissed and the tribunal noted that all parties had acted reasonably throughout the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal found no fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence; resignation was not caused by any repudiatory conduct of R2 but by the Claimant's pre-existing plan to take up another role. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim fell with the constructive dismissal claim because no dismissal under s.95(1) ERA 1996 was established. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract complaint (including non-payment of notice pay, underpayment of pension contributions, and underpayment of salary before termination) not established. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal accepted R2's reliance on clause 8.2 of the DSA permitting withholding of outstanding debts at termination, and found advance dividends paid April-July 2024 amounted to recoverable overpayments. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) v Sharp [1978] ICR 221
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 978
- Malik v BCCI [1998] AC 20
- Buckland v Bournemouth University [1977] IRLR 389
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.