Case 6017769/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Divani v Systems Mechanics Limited (in voluntary liquidation) Heard at Ashford by video — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017769/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Divani
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Divani did not attend the hearing and his phone went to voicemail when the clerk tried to call him. The tribunal also recorded that he had not replied to its correspondence, and it dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The respondent, Systems Mechanics Limited (in voluntary liquidation), was noted as having been in liquidation since 18 December 2024. The tribunal said it was likely the claimant had been directed to the National Insurance Fund for notice pay and, in any event, that he did not appear to be actively pursuing the case. The reasons do not set out merits findings on the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 47 for non-attendance/no response. The judgment does not separately analyse this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 for non-attendance/no response. The judgment does not separately analyse this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.