Case 6017833/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Irwin v Bar Foose Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6017833/2025
- Decision date
- 5 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Irwin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant had been given an opportunity on 5 March 2026 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out, with a response required by 2 pm that day.
The judgment records that the Tribunal had also written to the claimant on 15 January 2026 asking him to confirm whether he had been paid by the respondent, with an answer required by 22 January 2026. The claimant did not reply to that letter and did not make representations or request a hearing, so the claim was struck out and the hearing fixed for 6 March 2026 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim is struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The PDF text does not give a separate merits determination or remedy. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim is struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The PDF text does not give a separate merits determination or remedy. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.