Case 6017835/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Oti v Heartland Care Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6017835/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Oti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs C Oti presented her claim on 7 November 2024. The respondent, Heartland Care Services Limited, did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages from 10 August 2024 to 31 March 2025, totalling £14,723.28. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the National Minimum Wage for the period 1 April 2024 to 9 August 2024, with a further £403.65 deducted.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £15,126.93 gross in total. The judgment records that this sum is in addition to the £15,046.62 awarded to the claimant in case numbers 3200743/2024 and 3200986/2924.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages between 10 August 2024 and 31 March 2025 (£14,723.28) and failure to pay the National Minimum Wage from 1 April 2024 to 9 August 2024 (£403.65), and ordered payment of £15,126.93 gross. | Upheld | — | £15,127 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,127
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.