Case 6017841/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Simon Redmond v Cherry Hinton and Brookfields Medical Centre — 2026
- Case reference
- 6017841/2025
- Decision date
- 2 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Simon Redmond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered Simon Redmond's unfair dismissal complaint against Cherry Hinton and Brookfields Medical Centre at a public video hearing at Bury St Edmunds on 17 March 2026. Employment Judge Boyes sat alone.
The judgment found that the unfair dismissal complaint had been made outside the primary three-month time limit. It also found that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be made within that primary time limit, and that the complaint was presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to deal with the unfair dismissal complaint and that the complaint proceeds. The judgment did not decide whether the dismissal was unfair on its merits and recorded no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary judgment on time limits and jurisdiction only. The tribunal found it had jurisdiction and that the unfair dismissal complaint proceeds; the merits were not determined. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- such further period as the Tribunal considers reasonable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.