Case 6017869/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Fabio Andres Viveros Lopez v Quantuma — 2026
- Case reference
- 6017869/2024
- Decision date
- 10 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Fabio Andres Viveros Lopez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 10 January 2026 giving him until 31 January 2026 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant had also not responded to earlier correspondence about the named respondent and related matters, and had not contacted the Tribunal at all since presenting the claim. The Tribunal found that the claim was not being actively pursued and that it was proportionate to strike it out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing identifies Breach of Contract, but the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing identifies Unfair Dismissal, but the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.