Case 6017891/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Irhuebor v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6017891/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Miss S Harwood, Mrs S Jeary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Irhuebor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Irhuebor brought claims of unfair dismissal and race discrimination against Amazon UK Services Limited. The matter was heard at East London Hearing Centre from 3 to 6 March 2026 before First-tier Tribunal Judge D Brannan acting as an Employment Judge, sitting with Miss S Harwood and Mrs S Jeary as lay members. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Mr Ludlow, instructed by Taylor Wessing.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed but dismissed the race discrimination claim. The Tribunal did not order re-engagement. The award was calculated using a gross weekly pay of £603, net weekly pay of £502.09, claimant's age of 32, and 2 years of service, with an effective date of termination of 7 August 2024 and date of award 6 March 2026 (82.285714 weeks since termination).
The basic award before deductions was £1,206, reduced by 30% contributory fault to £844.20. The compensatory award before deductions was £41,314.83; a 60% Polkey deduction reduced it to £16,525.93, then a 30% contributory fault deduction brought it to £11,568.15, with £2,221.87 income from casual work credited, yielding £9,346.28. £300 was awarded for loss of statutory rights, giving a grand total of £10,490.48. The Universal Credit prescribed element of £1,942.42 (70% of actual UC received, reflecting the 30% contributory fault) is subject to recoupment for the period April 2025 to February 2026 and is not to be paid until recoupment has been applied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim succeeded. Total award £10,490.48 comprising basic award of £844.20 (after 30% contributory fault reduction from £1,206), compensatory award of £9,346.28 (after a 60% Polkey deduction and a 30% contributory fault deduction, with £2,221.87 income from casual work credited and Universal Credit prescribed element of £1,942.42 subject to recoupment for April 2025 to February 2026), and £300 for loss of statutory rights. Re-engagement was not ordered. | Upheld | — | £10,490 |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,490
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £844
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,346
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.