Case 6018067/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Dury v Pelagic Trading Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018067/2024
- Decision date
- 1 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Dury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss F Dury brought a claim against Pelagic Trading Limited at London South Employment Tribunal, heard on 18 March 2025 before Employment Judge Youngs. The judgment records that the claim was for unauthorised deductions from wages and that it related to her period of employment in July 2024.
The tribunal upheld the claim. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £668.24, identified in the judgment as the gross amount deducted. The judgment also states that the Claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance contributions on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded in relation to the Claimant's period of employment in July 2024. The Respondent was ordered to pay £668.24, described as the gross amount deducted; the Claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £668 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £668
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.