Case 6018070/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Brown v Cuerden Care — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018070/2024
- Decision date
- 12 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Malik
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Malik sitting alone in Manchester by CVP on 24 April 2025. The only claim identified in the judgment was Miss S Brown's claim for unfair dismissal against Cuerden Care.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim under Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, Rule 38(1)(a), because it had no reasonable prospect of success. No liability hearing or remedy assessment followed, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment does not record any monetary award or any split of compensation, and it states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual rules. Judgment was sent to the parties on 12 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out at a preliminary hearing under Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, Rule 38(1)(a), on the basis that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.