Case 6018078/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shevani Reji Muthukumar v Nemaura Pharma Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018078/2024
- Decision date
- 27 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shevani Reji Muthukumar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the East Midlands Employment Tribunal on 9 November 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Broughton determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the substance, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,618.26. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's contractual entitlement to gym membership, and ordered payment of £197.50 in respect of that entitlement.
The judgment recorded a total amount payable of £1,815.76. The hearing listed for 28 February 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,618.26. | Upheld | — | £1,618 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's contractual entitlement to gym membership and ordered payment of £197.50. | Upheld | — | £198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,816
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.