Case 6018119/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E Cowley v ARC Catering & Events Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018119/2024
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Cowley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made on the claim in accordance with Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that Arc Catering & Events Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from E Cowley’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £150.00.
The judgment does not set out any separate award components beyond that wage deduction sum. The accompanying notice explains the tribunal’s general interest provisions and records the relevant decision day as 17 March 2025, but no separate interest amount is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Upheld | — | £150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £150
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.